We discuss a federal court victory against Unum in a disability case involving a McKinsey consultant with a mental-health claim. Despite Unum’s multiple medical paper reviews and denial tactics, the judge conducted a de novo review, gave greater weight to treating specialists who had examined the claimant, and ruled in her favor. The decision highlights that mental-health disability claims—though subjective and difficult—can succeed when supported by thorough medical documentation, and reflects growing judicial scrutiny of Unum’s denial practices.
Long Term Disability Law BlogAttorneys Helping Disabled Claimants Nationwide
Long Term Disability Law Blog

