In this video, disability insurance lawyers Gregory Dell and Alex Palamara discuss Mr. Palamara’s recent win of an administrative appeal against Mutual of Omaha. The claimant suffered from a multitude of medical issues, including COPD, emphysema, lupus, spinal stenosis, and fibromyalgia. Mutual of Omaha denied his claim for short term disability benefits after a nurse reviewed his medical records.
Continue reading

In this video, Attorneys Gregory Dell and Cesar Gavidia discuss a current case Mr. Gavidia is litigating in Federal court concerning Aetna’s initial granting, then denying, long term disability benefits to a software engineer who suffered a stroke in 2011. He later returned to work, but after about three years, he started having issues with cognitive, visual, auditory, spatial, and perceptual functioning that interfered with his ability to do his job, so he filed a claim for long-term disability benefits with Aetna Insurance Company.

To support his claim, the engineer submitted his medical records from his neuropsychologist and reports of cognitive testing. Aetna’s own medical professionals agreed with the reports, so Aetna approved his claim. About 18 months later, benefits were terminated. As a basis for its denial of any further disability benefits, Aetna relied somewhat on the claimant’s social media postings that indicated to Aetna that the man was not disabled. Aetna also denied his administrative appeal.

That is when Mr. Gavidia became involved in the case and filed an ERISA lawsuit in Federal court. The main litigation issues are: 1) The policy appears to only require claimants to be disabled from their own occupation, but denial letters say he must be disabled from any occupation; 2) Aetna chose an incorrect specialist to examine and review the records. It should have chosen a neuropsychologist; 3) Aetna’s neurologist only spent about 30 minutes with the claimant, conducted only a screening test, and did not review raw data from the claimant’s treating physician’s neuropsychological testing.

This video is of disability attorneys Gregory Dell and Stephen Jessup discussing a case Mr. Jessup won on appeal against Hartford on behalf of his client who suffered from pain, swollen joints, and cognitive dysfunction due to Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). The man reported that his pain was under control, but his cognitive problems interfered with his ability to do his job.
Continue reading

In this video, disability attorneys Gregory Dell and Victor Peña discuss a case Mr. Peña won against MetLife for a claimant who came to us after his first appeal to MetLife was denied and his then attorney refused to continue. The man worked in a job that was classified as “light duty,” even though it required him to stand for long periods of time, lift heavy items, and work with tools. He suffered from back conditions, carpal tunnel syndrome, knee injuries and had other symptoms that interfered with his ability to work in his own occupation.
Continue reading

In this video, disability lawyers Gregory Dell and Alex Palamara discuss Mr. Palamara’s recent win on appeal of long-term disability benefits from Cigna on behalf of a registered nurse who suffered from disabling back conditions including spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease. Shortly after Cigna’s decision to award benefits, it made a buy-out settlement offer.
Continue reading

In this video, attorneys Gregory Dell and Stephen Jessup talk about the difficulties doctors often face when applying for disability benefits. Many doctors are hesitant to admit they have a disabling condition. They fear it may affect their ability to sell their medical practice. They are also concerned about what may happen if patients discover their doctor has medical problems.
Continue reading

In this video, Attorneys Gregory Dell and Victor Peña discuss trends with Disability Insurance companies. Insurers across the country seem to be getting stricter with their evaluation of claims. They are conducting more field interviews, more independent medical exams (IMEs), and using video surveillance. The goal seems to be to deny as many claims as possible. The more people a company has on claim, the less profit there is to the insurance company.

Unum, the oldest insurance company in America, is using long and extensive denial letters in an attempt to make it seem difficult to challenge. Other companies, particularly Cigna, seem to have a policy of denying initial claims. They take advantage of every level to deny a claim in order to discourage and delay the award of disability benefits. At Dell & Schaefer, we work diligently to present enough medical information so that we may be able to avoid the deny and delay tactic.
Continue reading

In Sarah G. Gorena v. Aenta Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff was employed for 10 years as a staff analyst for Boeing when she sought disability benefits solely due to her diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), although she had a number of other health issues. After being awarded several periods of short-term disability, in July 2015, she made a claim for long-term disability benefits (LTD). Her claim was denied, as was her administrative appeal. After exhausting her administrative remedies, she filed this ERISA lawsuit.
Continue reading

In Mark v. Aetna Life Insurance Company and FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc., Plaintiff Julia Mark, an employee of FedEx Office, injured her neck, back, ankle, and left knee when she fell on a sidewalk. Her left knee continued to cause her pain. She filed a claim for short term disability benefits (STD) with Aetna, the disability Plan Administrator to whom FedEx had delegated authority to interpret the plan.
Continue reading

In this recent case out of California, the Plaintiff previously worked in IT for the Capital Group Companies. However, he was forced to stop working on February 2, 2011, due to chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia. Through his employer, the former IT employee had long term disability coverage under a Policy with Reliance Standard. After applying for benefits, his claim was approved in August 2011 and ultimately paid through March of 2015. Unfortunately benefits after March of 2015 were denied as Reliance Standard believed he no longer satisfied the definition of disability. After numerous appeals were filed and numerous reviews conducted, a lawsuit was filed.
Continue reading